Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A toxicological analysis was developed and validated for simultaneous screening and quantification of methadone (METH) and its primary metabolite 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP). The method employs microscale liquid-liquid extraction (microLLE) and direct injection of a separated aliquot of the organic layer into a gas chromatography/mass spectrometric (GC/MS) system without any other pre-treatment stages. A fast GC/MS runtime (total 5.8 min; METH, Rt = 3.55 min; EDDP, Rt = 3.40 min) combined with rapid sample preparation allowed cost-efficient and routinely applicable performance with a low amount of manual work. The validated parameters included: linearity (25-1000 ng mL(-1) both; R(METH)2 = 0.998 and R(EDDP)2 = 0.997), accuracy (Bias(METH): from -0.05 to 11.3%, Bias(EDDP): from 1.11 to 4.37%); intra and inter-assay precision (RSD(METH): from 2.4 to 3.9%, from 4.89 to 10.3%; RSD(EDDP): from 4.50 to 6.20%, from 4.57 to 15.2%), extraction efficiency (METH = 95.5%; EDDP = 90.6%), LOQ(Meth,EDDP) = 25 ng mL(-1). Samples were stable for at least 25 h and no selectivity problems or baseline interference were observed. The method should be applicable for identifying and quantitative confirmation of possible misuse and/or illegal use of METH in toxicological cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gunnar et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: