Key result
Rare DPYD alleles linked to ~451% higher capecitabine toxicity risk, but clinical sensitivity is suboptimal.
Why the study?
The utility of genetic biomarkers to predict toxicity from fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimens remains uncertain.
Do genetic biomarkers (DPYD and TYMS variants) predict toxicity from fluorouracil-based regimens in patients with colorectal cancer?
Meta-Analysis (n=4,855)
Yes
Do genetic biomarkers (DPYD and TYMS variants) predict toxicity from fluorouracil-based regimens in patients with colorectal cancer?
Odds Ratio: 5.51
p-value: p=0.0013
A panel of four DPYD and TYMS variants predicts capecitabine toxicity but with suboptimal sensitivity and positive predictive value for clinical use.
May support preemptive DPYD/TYMS testing to mitigate capecitabine toxicity; confirms associations yet leaves clinical adoption open given suboptimal performance.
PURPOSE: Fluourouracil (FU) is a mainstay of chemotherapy, although toxicities are common. Genetic biomarkers have been used to predict these adverse events, but their utility is uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We tested candidate polymorphisms identified from a systematic literature search for associations with capecitabine toxicity in 927 patients with colorectal cancer in the Quick and Simple and Reliable trial (QUASAR2). We then performed meta-analysis of QUASAR2 and 16 published studies (n = 4,855 patients) to examine the polymorphisms in various FU monotherapy and combination therapy regimens. RESULTS: Global capecitabine toxicity (grades 0/1/2 v grades 3/4/5) was associated with the rare, functional DPYD alleles 2846T>A and *2A (combined odds ratio, 5.51; P = .0013) and with the common TYMS polymorphisms 5'VNTR2R/3R and 3'UTR 6bp ins-del (combined odds ratio, 1.31; P = 9.4 × 10(-6)). There was weaker evidence that these polymorphisms predict toxicity from bolus and infusional FU monotherapy. No good evidence of association with toxicity was found for the remaining polymorphisms, including several currently included in predictive kits. No polymorphisms were associated with toxicity in combination regimens. CONCLUSION: A panel of genetic biomarkers for capecitabine monotherapy toxicity would currently comprise only the four DPYD and TYMS variants above. We estimate this test could provide 26% sensitivity, 86% specificity, and 49% positive predictive value-better than most available commercial kits, but suboptimal for clinical use. The test panel might be extended to include additional, rare DPYD variants functionally equivalent to *2A and 2846A, though insufficient evidence supports its use in bolus, infusional, or combination FU. There remains a need to identify further markers of FU toxicity for all regimens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosmarin et al. (2014) conducted a meta-analysis in Colorectal cancer and fluorouracil toxicity (n=4,855). DPYD alleles 2846T>A and *2A, and TYMS polymorphisms 5'VNTR2R/3R and 3'UTR 6bp ins-del vs. Absence of these polymorphisms was evaluated on Global capecitabine toxicity (grades 0/1/2 v grades 3/4/5) (OR 5.51, p=0.0013). Rare DPYD alleles (OR 5.51; P=0.0013) and common TYMS polymorphisms (OR 1.31; P=9.4x10^-6) were associated with global capecitabine toxicity, though sensitivity is suboptimal for clinical use.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: