Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Lessons on question content and refinement of a 2003 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality-Health Resources Services Administration (AHRQ-HRSA) pilot hospital preparedness assessment tool designed to capture activities in more detail than previous studies are reported in this study. METHODS: Responses from fixed-choice questions, including organizational and geographical differences, were analyzed using the chi-square test. Open-ended questions were evaluated qualitatively. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 91% had developed plans and 97% designated a bio-event coordinator, but only 47% had allocated funds. Urban hospitals were more likely to participate in regional infectious disease monitoring. Hospitals that participated in a network were more likely to fund preparedness, share bio-event coordinators and medical directors, and provide advanced training. CONCLUSIONS: Several issues deserve further study: (1) hospital networks may provide the structure to promote preparedness; (2) specific procedures (e.g., expanding outpatient treatment capacity) have not been tested; and (3) special attention should be directed towards integrating non-urban hospitals into regional surveillance systems to ensure early identification of infectious disease outbreaks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thorne et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: