Key result
Continuing prehospital statins in septic shock is not associated with shorter vasopressor duration.
Why the study?
Does continuation of prehospital statin therapy reduce the duration of vasopressor therapy in adult ICU patients with septic shock?
Cohort (n=119)
No
Does continuation of prehospital statin therapy reduce the duration of vasopressor therapy in adult ICU patients with septic shock?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.3% vs 4.8%
p-value: p=0.21
Continuation of prehospital statins in septic shock does not reduce vasopressor requirements but may be associated with a trend toward lower mortality.
Does not support continuing prehospital statins to shorten vasopressor therapy in septic shock; leaves open possible mortality association for randomized study.
BACKGROUND: Studies have evaluated the use of statins in sepsis; however, no human studies have explored their effect on vasopressor requirements in septic shock. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to determine the effect of prehospital statin continuation on duration of vasopressor therapy in patients with septic shock. Secondary objectives included maximum and average vasopressor dose and in-hospital mortality. METHODS: This was a retrospective, institutional board-approved, observational cohort study in a community teaching hospital; 119 adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with an ICD-9 code for septic shock and prehospital statin therapy were evaluated. Multivariate analyses were performed to address confounders. RESULTS: Of the 1229 patients screened, 119 (10%) met inclusion criteria; 73 patients (61%) had a statin continued within 24 hours of ICU admission. Crude analysis demonstrated no difference in vasopressor duration in the statin versus no statin group (3.3 vs 4.8 days; P = 0.21). There was no difference in either maximum (17.9 ± 16.1 vs 23.8 ± 21.7 µg/min norepinephrine equivalents [NEQs]; P = 0.1) or average vasopressor dose (9.5 ± 8.4 vs 12.1 ± 11.5 µg/min NEQ; P = 0.17). There was a decrease in mortality in the statin patients (43% vs 67 %; P = 0.05). On adjustment for potential confounders, there was no difference in any outcome, with a persistent trend toward lower mortality in the statin group. CONCLUSION: Continuation of prehospital statin therapy decreased neither duration nor dose of vasopressors in patients with septic shock but yielded a trend toward decreased mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zechmeister et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in septic shock (n=119). Continuation of prehospital statin therapy vs. No statin was evaluated on duration of vasopressor therapy (p=0.21). Continuation of prehospital statin therapy in patients with septic shock did not significantly decrease the duration of vasopressor therapy (3.3 vs 4.8 days; P=0.21).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: