Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of an automated variable velocity-encoding sequence and improve the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) on magnetic resonance angiograms with use of phase contrast and a pelvic phased-array coil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three cardiac-gated, two-dimensional (2D), phase-contrast (PC) sequences were evaluated in 10 healthy subjects. A 2D gated PC sequence with variable velocity encoding (velocity-optimized phase contrast [VOPC]) was compared with gated 2D PC sequences performed with high or low constant velocity encoding. S/Ns in VOPC images obtained with a pelvic phased-array coil were compared with those in VOPC images obtained with a body coil. RESULTS: Two blinded readers preferred VOPC for simultaneous display of large and small blood vessels in one acquisition compared with constant low (P = .0105) and high (P = .0067) velocity encoding and for overall image interpretation. VOPC images obtained with the pelvic coil had a 68%-100% better S/N compared with those obtained with the body coil. CONCLUSION: Use of a phased-array coil and variable velocity encoding improves depiction of segmental vascular anatomic structures of the pelvis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swan et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: