Key result
Backward walking suppresses upper mu rhythms more than forward walking, implying greater sensorimotor cortex activity.
Why the study?
Evidence supporting the benefits of backward walking over forward walking for gait rehabilitation remained inconclusive.
Does backward walking induce larger mu-rhythm suppression effects than forward walking?
Does backward walking induce larger mu-rhythm suppression effects than forward walking?
Backward walking induces more sensorimotor cortex activity than forward walking, providing a neurophysiological basis for its potential benefits in gait rehabilitation.
May inform backward walking protocols in gait rehab; leaves open whether mu suppression yields functional gains.
Studies have compared the differences and similarities between backward walking and forward walking, and demonstrated the potential of backward walking for gait rehabilitation. However, current evidence supporting the benefits of backward walking over forward walking remains inconclusive. Considering the proven association between gait and the cerebral cortex, we used electroencephalograms (EEG) to differentiate the effects of backward walking and forward walking on cortical activities, by comparing the sensorimotor rhythm (8-12 Hz, also called mu rhythm) of EEG signals. A systematic signal procedure was used to eliminate the motion artifacts induced by walking to safeguard EEG signal fidelity. Statistical test results of our experimental data demonstrated that walking motions significantly suppressed mu rhythm. Moreover, backward walking exhibited significantly larger upper mu rhythm (10-12 Hz) suppression effects than forward walking did. This finding implies that backward walking induces more sensorimotor cortex activity than forward walking does, and provides a basis to support the potential benefits of backward walking over forward walking. By monitoring the upper mu rhythm throughout the rehabilitation process, medical experts can adaptively adjust the intensity and duration of each walking training session to improve the efficacy of a walking ability recovery program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2020) studied this question. Backward walking vs. Forward walking was evaluated on Upper mu rhythm (10-12 Hz) suppression effects. Backward walking exhibited significantly larger upper mu rhythm (10-12 Hz) suppression effects than forward walking, implying greater sensorimotor cortex activity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Sensors