Validity coefficients for a single assessment center implemented in multiple locations are presented. Correction for range restriction, criterion unreliability, and sampling error did not account for a large portion of the variability in these validity coefficients. The type of assessor used, the center's administrative arrangement, and prior assessor‐assessee contact moderated these validities. It is suggested that the quality of the implementation of a selection procedure when there is local latitude in its implementation is an important factor in determining the procedure's effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmitt et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: