The objective of this experiment was to determine the effect of varying the dietary degradable protein balance (DPB) on finishing cattle performance. Crossbred yearling steers (n=300; BW=460±26kg) were allotted to 12 pens (25 steers/pen) and fed barley grain-based finishing diets with negative DPB (−12g/kg of DM), neutral DPB (0g/ kg of DM), or positive DPB (14g/kg of DM). The diet with negative DPB contained 88.3% barley grain and 4.7% barley silage. For the neutral and positive DPB diets, 11 and 22% of dietary barley grain, respectively, was replaced by wheat-based dried distillers grains with solubles. Increasing DPB in the diet increased the concentration of most nutrients linearly (P<0.05), except for starch, which linearly (P<0.05) decreased. With increasing DPB, the extent of rumen degradability decreased (P<0.05) for OM (73.9 to 69.5%) and CP (74.3 to 68.6%), but not (P>0.05) starch (88.3±1.36%), whereas protein supply in the small intestine (78.8 to 91.2g/kg of DM) increased (P<0.05). Over the 131-d finishing period, DMI (11.6±0.20kg/d), ADG (1.8±0.01kg/d), G:F (0.16±0.01), BW (677.8±0.58kg), HCW (397.5±3.40kg), DP (58.6±0.47%), QG, and YG were similar (P>0.05) among treatments. In conclusion, when diets were formulated to meet or exceed nutrient requirements for targeted performance, changing dietary DPB from −12 to 14g/kg had no major effect on animal performance and carcass characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Damiran et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: