The electronic structure of zinc aluminate (ZnAl 2 O 4 ) and that of zinc gallate (ZnGa 2 O 4 ) were studied by the self-consistent tight-binding linearized muffin-tin orbital method with the atomic sphere approximation. The calculated results predict these zinc-based spinel oxides to be direct-gap materials. The direct gap at is found to be 4.11 eV for ZnAl 2 O 4 and 2.79 eV for ZnGa 2 O 4 . With reference to the calculated band gap of 5.36 eV for MgAl 2 O 4 , the systematic decrease in the gap is attributed to the presence of 3d orbitals of Zn and Ga and the associated p-d hybridization in the upper valence band of zinc aluminate and gallate. Comparison of the contour maps of the electron localization function of ZnAl 2 O 4 and ZnGa 2 O 4 with that of MgAl 2 O 4 clearly shows the bonding to be less ionic in the zinc-based spinel oxides. Finally, the calculations yield a smaller electron effective mass for zinc gallate as compared to that for zinc aluminate, suggesting a higher mobility of electrons in gallate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sampath et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: