Key result
Ca4Mn(DPDP)5 co-treatment with oxaliplatin is linked to a ~50% CIPN increase via platinum-manganese redox interactions.
Why the study?
Recent phase III trials showed that Ca4Mn(DPDP)5 unexpectedly increased oxaliplatin-associated peripheral neuropathy, contrasting with earlier positive findings with MnDPDP and creating a need to understand the underlying mechanisms.
Does Ca4Mn(DPDP)5 prevent chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in colorectal cancer patients receiving FOLFOX6?
Does Ca4Mn(DPDP)5 prevent chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in colorectal cancer patients receiving FOLFOX6?
The failure of calmangafodipir to prevent oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy may be explained by redox interactions between platinum and manganese, suggesting that the previously reported protective efficacy of mangafodipir is due to platinum chelation by DPDP rather than manganese-mediated antioxidant activity.
Platinum-containing chemotherapeutic drugs are efficacious in many forms of cancer but are dose-restricted by serious side effects, of which peripheral neuropathy induced by oxidative–nitrosative-stress-mediated chain reactions is most disturbing. Recently, hope has been raised regarding the catalytic antioxidants mangafodipir (MnDPDP) and calmangafodipir [Ca4Mn(DPDP)5; PledOx®], which by mimicking mitochondrial manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) may be expected to overcome oxaliplatin-associated chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Unfortunately, two recent phase III studies (POLAR A and M trials) applying Ca4Mn(DPDP)5 in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients receiving multiple cycles of FOLFOX6 (5-FU + oxaliplatin) failed to demonstrate efficacy. Instead of an anticipated 50% reduction in the incidence of CIPN in patients co-treated with Ca4Mn(DPDP)5, a statistically significant increase of about 50% was seen. The current article deals with confusing differences between early and positive findings with MnDPDP in comparison to the recent findings with Ca4Mn(DPDP)5. The POLAR failure may also reveal important mechanisms behind oxaliplatin-associated CIPN itself. Thus, exacerbated neurotoxicity in patients receiving Ca4Mn(DPDP)5 may be explained by redox interactions between Pt2+ and Mn2+ and subtle oxidative–nitrosative chain reactions. In peripheral sensory nerves, Pt2+ presumably leads to oxidation of the Mn2+ from Ca4Mn(DPDP)5 as well as from Mn2+ in MnSOD and other endogenous sources. Thereafter, Mn3+ may be oxidized by peroxynitrite (ONOO−) into Mn4+, which drives site-specific nitration of tyrosine (Tyr) 34 in the MnSOD enzyme. Conformational changes of MnSOD then lead to the closure of the superoxide (O2•−) access channel. A similar metal-driven nitration of Tyr74 in cytochrome c will cause an irreversible disruption of electron transport. Altogether, these events may uncover important steps in the mechanism behind Pt2+-associated CIPN. There is little doubt that the efficacy of MnDPDP and its therapeutic improved counterpart Ca4Mn(DPDP)5 mainly depends on their MnSOD-mimetic activity when it comes to their potential use as rescue medicines during, e.g., acute myocardial infarction. However, pharmacokinetic considerations suggest that the efficacy of MnDPDP on Pt2+-associated neurotoxicity depends on another action of this drug. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) studies have demonstrated that Pt2+ outcompetes Mn2+ and endogenous Zn2+ in binding to fodipir (DPDP), hence suggesting that the previously reported protective efficacy of MnDPDP against CIPN is a result of chelation and elimination of Pt2+ by DPDP, which in turn suggests that Mn2+ is unnecessary for efficacy when it comes to oxaliplatin-associated CIPN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karlsson et al. (2024) conducted a review in Oxaliplatin-associated chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Ca4Mn(DPDP)5 (calmangafodipir) and MnDPDP (mangafodipir) was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: