Key result
Sitosterolemia linked to ~4-fold higher post-prandial ApoB48 AUC and remnant lipoproteins versus heterozygous FH.
Why the study?
How does post-prandial remnant lipoprotein metabolism differ in sitosterolemic patients compared to heterozygous carriers and heterozygous FH patients after an oral fat load?
Observational (n=15)
How does post-prandial remnant lipoprotein metabolism differ in sitosterolemic patients compared to heterozygous carriers and heterozygous FH patients after an oral fat load?
Absolute Event Rate: 37% vs 9%
p-value: p=<0.05
Sitosterolemic patients exhibit significantly greater post-prandial accumulation of remnant lipoproteins compared to patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.
Suggests exaggerated remnant accumulation in sitosterolemia; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice versus FH.
Background: It has been shown that sitosterolemic patients are vulnerable to diet-induced hypercholesterolemia. However, few data exist regarding post-prandial accumulation of lipoproteins in this rare condition. Methods: OFTT cream 50 g was given per body surface area (m2), blood sampling was performed at 2 hour intervals up to 6 hour. Plasma lipoprotein fractions and RLP fractions were determined in four sitosterolemic subjects with double mutations in ATP-binding cassette (ABC) sub-family G member 5 or member 8 (ABCG5 or ABCG8) gene (mean age=18yr, median LDL-C=154mg/dl), six heterozygous carriers (31yr, median LDL-C=105mg/dl), and five subjects with heterozygous FH (mean age=32yr, median LDL-C=221mg/dl). The area under curve (AUC) of lipids, including LDL-C, apolipoprotein B48 (ApoB48), RLP-TG, and RLP-C were evaluated. Results: After oral fat load, the AUC of LDL-C was significantly smaller in sitosterolemia subjects than that in heterozygous FH (977 mg/dl×hour vs. 1,333 mg/dl×hour, p<0.05), whereas, the AUC of ApoB48 was significantly larger in the sitosterolemic subjects compared with that of heterozygous FH (37 mg/dl×hour vs. 9 mg/dl×hour. P<0.05). Under these conditions, the AUCs of RLP-C, and RLP-TG levels were significantly larger in the sitosterolemic subject compared with those of heterozygous FH (92 mg/dl×hour vs. 53 mg/dl×hour, p<0.05, 375 mg/dl×hour vs. 238 mg/dl×hour, p<0.05, respectively), whereas, those of heterozygous carriers were comparable to those with heterozygous FH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tada et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Sitosterolemia (n=15). Sitosterolemia vs. Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia was evaluated on Area under curve (AUC) of apolipoprotein B48 (ApoB48) (p=<0.05). Sitosterolemic subjects exhibited significantly larger post-prandial AUCs for ApoB48 (37 vs 9 mg/dl×hour, p<0.05) and remnant lipoproteins compared to subjects with heterozygous FH.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: