Key result
Respiratory gating fails to alter murine SPECT parameters, while positioning shifts EDV and ESV >5%.
Why the study?
Cardiac parameters from murine myocardial perfusion SPECT can be affected by respiratory motion, image filtering, and animal positioning, requiring investigation of their influence.
Do respiratory gating, image filtering, and animal positioning affect cardiac parameters obtained from ultra-high-resolution murine myocardial perfusion SPECT?
Do respiratory gating, image filtering, and animal positioning affect cardiac parameters obtained from ultra-high-resolution murine myocardial perfusion SPECT?
In murine ultra-high-resolution SPECT, animal positioning and image filtering significantly affect measured cardiac parameters, whereas respiratory gating does not.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Standardize positioning and filtering in murine SPECT for reproducibility; leaves open respiratory gating value in other models or conditions.
Cardiac parameters obtained from single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) images can be affected by respiratory motion, image filtering, and animal positioning. We investigated the influence of these factors on ultra-high-resolution murine myocardial perfusion SPECT. Five mice were injected with 99m technetium (99mTc)-tetrofosmin, and each was scanned in supine and prone positions in a U-SPECT-II scanner with respiratory and electrocardiographic (ECG) gating. ECG-gated SPECT images were created without applying respiratory motion correction or with two different respiratory motion correction strategies. The images were filtered with a range of three-dimensional gaussian kernels, after which end-diastolic volumes (EDVs), end-systolic volumes (ESVs), and left ventricular ejection fractions were calculated. No significant differences in the measured cardiac parameters were detected when any strategy to reduce or correct for respiratory motion was applied, whereas big differences (> 5%) in EDV and ESV were found with regard to different positioning of animals. A linear relationship (p < .001) was found between the EDV or ESV and the kernel size of the gaussian filter. In short, respiratory gating did not significantly affect the cardiac parameters of mice obtained with ultra-high-resolution SPECT, whereas the position of the animals and the image filters should be the same in a comparative study with multiple scans to avoid systematic differences in measured cardiac parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2015) studied this question. Respiratory gating, image filtering, and animal positioning was evaluated on Cardiac parameters (end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and left ventricular ejection fraction) (p=<.001). Respiratory gating did not significantly affect murine cardiac parameters on ultra-high-resolution SPECT, whereas animal positioning caused >5% differences in EDV and ESV.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: