Randomized double-blind trial finds higher vitamin D supplementation safely achieves biochemical sufficiency in pregnant women and infants, indicating no immediate impact on neonatal bone mass.
CONTEXT: Hypovitaminosis D during pregnancy is common and may have adverse maternal and neonatal effects. While randomized trials show that supplementation improves biochemical vitamin D status, the optimal dose and its effects on neonatal bone outcomes remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of 2 vitamin D supplementation doses during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) at delivery, and on neonatal bone mineral content. METHODS: In this double-blind trial, pregnant women ≤17.5 weeks' gestation with baseline 25(OH)D 10 to 30 ng/mL were randomized to receive either 20 000 IU/week or 10 000 IU every 2 weeks (equivalent to 714 IU/day) vitamin D3. Primary outcomes were the proportion of women achieving a 25(OH)D level ≥20 ng/mL at delivery and neonatal bone mineral content (BMC) at ∼1 month of age. We used liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (standard LC-MS/MS) at a CDC-certified laboratory. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-two maternal neonatal pairs had complete biochemical data and 67 neonates had evaluable DXA scans. A significantly higher proportion (100%) of women and neonates (77%) in the higher dose group achieved 25(OH)D levels ≥20 ng/mL at delivery, compared with the lower dose group (85% and 40%, respectively, P = .001). Mean 25(OH)D in mothers and neonates at delivery followed a similar pattern (P = .001). However, neonatal subtotal whole-body BMC did not differ between groups (45.9 ± 8.5 vs 42.2 ± 7.1 g, respectively; P = .059), nor did neonatal bone mineral density or bone area. We did not identify any safety concerns related to supplementation. CONCLUSION: Higher dose vitamin D supplementation safely achieved biochemical sufficiency in mothers and neonates without measurable effect on neonatal bone outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chakhtoura et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: