An attempt to improve our understanding of how laboratory training affects cross-language speech perception was reported recently by Logan et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 874–886 (1991)]. However, several problems in methodology have prompted a critique of their report. The following discussion explores these problems in an effort to clarify the issues and assess the claims of the authors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John Pruitt (1993) studied this question.