Key result
Obesity shows no link to short-term mortality in mavacamten-treated patients with obstructive HCM.
Why the study?
Obesity is common in HCM and linked to adverse outcomes, but its impact in patients treated with mavacamten remains unclear.
Does obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) compared to BMI < 30 kg/m² worsen short-term cardiovascular outcomes in adults with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy treated with mavacamten?
Cohort (n=883)
Yes
Does obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) compared to BMI < 30 kg/m² worsen short-term cardiovascular outcomes in adults with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy treated with mavacamten?
In a real-world cohort of patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy prescribed mavacamten, baseline obesity was not associated with a statistically significant difference in short-term cardiovascular outcomes compared to non-obese patients.
Obesity was not associated with worse short-term mavacamten outcomes in obstructive HCM; hypothesis-generating for longer-term BMI effects.
Obesity is common in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and is typically linked to adverse outcomes, but its impact in patients treated with mavacamten remains unclear. Using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, we identified adults with obstructive HCM (ICD-10-CM: I42.1) who had a documented mavacamten prescription. The index date was defined as the date of the first documented prescription. BMI classification used the closest BMI recorded within 365 days before or on the index date; post-index BMI values were not used. Patients were stratified by BMI (≥ 30 vs. <30 kg/m²) and matched 1:1 using propensity scores. Outcomes were assessed from 1 day after the index date through the last recorded clinical encounter or event of interest. After matching, 291 patients were included in each BMI group. Median follow-up was 315 days in the BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² group and 322 days in the BMI < 30 kg/m² group (overall median, 318 days; IQR, 110–485 days). All-cause mortality occurred in 10/291 patients in each group (platform-reported risk, 3.4% vs. 3.5%; HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.12–1.87). Kaplan-Meier survival did not differ between groups (log-rank p = 0.21). No statistically significant between-group differences were observed for myocardial infarction, stroke, venous thromboembolism, acute kidney injury, hypotension, AF/AFL, or VT/VF. The sensitivity analysis comparing BMI ≥ 35 with BMI 25–34.9 kg/m² also identified no statistically significant differences, although event rates were low and confidence intervals were wide. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in the selected short-term coded clinical outcomes among patients with obstructive HCM and a documented mavacamten prescription. However, the short follow-up, low event rates, and wide confidence intervals preclude conclusions regarding equivalence, comparative treatment efficacy, pharmacologic response, formal medication tolerability, or long-term safety across BMI categories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abumuhfouz et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=883). Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) vs. BMI < 30 kg/m² was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.12-1.87, p=0.23). Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) was not associated with a statistically significant difference in short-term all-cause mortality compared to BMI < 30 kg/m² among mavacamten-treated patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HR 0.47).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: