Purpose: Two philosophies of intervention exist in aphasia rehabilitation: impairment-based approaches and socially oriented approaches. Both approaches have been shown to improve communication in persons with aphasia, but no studies have directly compared the effects of each approach or a combined approach on a targeted linguistic skill. This article explores the effects of individual and group therapies used both in isolation and in combination on verb production in aphasia.Methods: Twelve individuals with chronic aphasia were trained on transitive verbs under three conditions—individual, group and combined—over a 6-week interval. Treatment was counterbalanced across subject and training groups. A delayed-treatment, within-participant design was used. Verb probe data were collected at 10 points throughout the study. Language measures were taken at two intervals pre- and two intervals post-treatment. Functional, narrative and quality-of-life measures were taken once pre- and once post-treatment.Results: Significant change was observed on linguistic, functional communication and quality-of-life measures. There was no significant effect of treatment condition.Conclusions: The results provide evidence of linguistic and psychosocial change in individuals with chronic aphasia following this treatment. Results failed to find that one treatment condition was superior to others.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoover et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: