Although completely equivalent for the description of puckered ring conformers, the two popular coordinates sets of Strauss–Pickett dihedral angles and Cremer–Pople spherical coordinates are shown to have contrasting features when employed as collective variables in free-energy calculations with accelerated sampling techniques. Results from a 100 ns molecular dynamics simulation at conformational equilibrium and from combined metadynamics/umbrella sampling calculations of glucose are exploited to elucidate these differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sega et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: