In matched-field processing, the signals measured at sensors in an array are correlated with the expected signals for a target at a specified point in the environment. This tends to be a computer intensive process because there are a large number of possible target locations and the calculation of the sound field may be complicated. A search by an operator for the target involves examination of various cuts through a multi-dimensional search space. In this paper it is shown that use of table lookup simplifies the modeling problem. Also, by use of matched-field tracking, the data can be processed in large time (∼3 to 10 min) blocks. Using these methods, the processing can be done in real time with little, or no, operator intervention. An example of automatic matched-field tracking is presented using data collected during a shallow water test near San Clemente Island. Finally, a simple sensitivity study is made. The actual sound speed profile is replaced by one modified by low-pass filtering and, in a second case, by a constant speed profile. The results show that matched-field tracking, although degraded, still provides useful tracking data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bucker et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: