Key result
Time domain heart period variability measures are strongly linked to death after AMI.
Why the study?
Correlations among time and frequency domain measures of heart period variability after acute myocardial infarction and their predictive value for death were not fully characterized.
Do time and frequency domain measures of heart period variability correlate with each other and predict death in patients after acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=715)
Yes
Do time and frequency domain measures of heart period variability correlate with each other and predict death in patients after acute myocardial infarction?
Time domain measures of heart rate variability are essentially equivalent to frequency domain measures and serve as strong, independent predictors of mortality following acute myocardial infarction.
Seven hundred fifteen participants from a multicenter natural history study of acute myocardial infarction were studied (1) to determine the correlations among time and frequency domain measures of heart period variability, (2) to determine the correlations between the measures of heart period variability and previously established post-infarction risk predictors, and (3) to determine the predictive value of time domain measures of heart period variability for death during follow-up after acute myocardial infarction. Twenty-four hour electrocardiographic recordings obtained 11 +/- 3 days after acute myocardial infarction were analyzed and 11 measures of heart period variability were computed. Each of 4 bands in the heart period power spectrum had 1 or 2 corresponding variables in the time domain that correlated with it so strongly (r greater than or equal to 0.90) that the variables were essentially equivalent: ultra low frequency power with SDNN* and SDANN index,* very low frequency power and low-frequency power with SDNN index,* and high-frequency power with r-MSSD* and pNN50.* As expected from theoretical considerations, SDNN and the square root of total power were almost perfectly correlated. Correlations between the time and frequency domain measures of heart period variability and previously identified postinfarction risk predictors, e.g., left ventricular ejection fraction and ventricular arrhythmias, are remarkably weak. Time domain measures of heart period variability, especially those that measure ultra low or low-frequency power, are strongly and independently associated with death during follow-up. * Defined in Table II.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bigger et al. (1992) conducted a cohort in acute myocardial infarction (n=715). Heart period variability was evaluated on Correlations among time and frequency domain measures of heart period variability and predictive value for death. Time domain measures of heart period variability, especially ultra low or low-frequency power, are strongly and independently associated with death during follow-up after acute myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: