PURPOSE: This study analyzed the trueness of polymer-infiltrated ceramic and glass ceramic crowns manufactured using the chairside computer-aided design/manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system. METHODS: The master model designs crowns using a CAD program after acquiring a digital impression with an intraoral scanner. Vita Enamic (VE), Vita Suprinity (VS), and IPS e.max CAD (IPS) were used to manufacture 10 crowns each (total: 30 crowns), using the chairside CAD/CAM system (inLab MC XL). Trueness was evaluated by superimposing the CAD data on the scan data using a three-dimensional program. The Kruskal-Wallis H test, a nonparametric test, and the Mann-Whitney U test were performed by applying the significance level (0.05/3=0.016), which was adjusted by post-analysis Bonferroni testing. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the trueness between the samples (p<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the outer surface trueness between the samples (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that the milling accuracy of VE is better than that of VS and IPS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: