Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A study of eosinophils associated with cervical neoplastic squamous epithelium was undertaken to determine whether their presence is a marker for invasion. Forty cervical incisional biopsy specimens of high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (HSIL), 12 with an element of invasive carcinoma, and 2 of HSIL suspicious for invasion, and follow-up excisional specimens of 27 cases of HSIL and 6 of microinvasive and invasive carcinoma were reviewed. In both incisional biopsy and excisional specimens, the presence of >or=5 eosinophils/high-power fields (hpf) and >or=10 eosinophils/10 hpf were both highly significantly associated with invasion with a high degree of specificity and positive predictive value, whereas counts below these thresholds had a high negative predictive value. The authors propose: 1) eosinophil counts in cervical incisional biopsy specimens of >or=5/hpf and/or >or=10/10 hpf warrant a note of caution that invasion may be present even when none is identified in the specimen by conventional criteria; 2) eosinophil counts of >or=5/hpf and/or >or=10/10 hpf in excisional biopsy and hysterectomy specimens should raise the suspicion of invasion in cases in which only HSIL is identified in the initial sections, and warrant additional sections and/or levels to search for invasion; and 3) the above eosinophil counts may provide supportive evidence for invasion in cases with equivocal invasion by conventional criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spiegel et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: