Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The development of high-speed nanoindentation has enabled the acquisition of mechanical property maps over square millimeters of area with micron-scale resolution in reasonable amounts of time. This provides rich datasets which contain morphological and statistical data on the variation of mechanical properties in a microstructure. However, the influences of the indentation size and the deconvolution method employed on the extracted phase properties remain unclear. In this work, a range of depth/spacing increments was explored on two different materials systems, an Al-Cu eutectic alloy and a duplex stainless steel, representing an ‘easy’ and a ‘hard’ case for statistical deconvolution, respectively. A total of ~ 500,000 indentations were performed. A variety of statistical analyses were then employed and compared: the 1D analysis of Ulm et al. using 2 and 3 phases, a 2D rotated Gaussian fit, K-means clustering, and a visual comparison to 2D histograms. This revealed several different sensitivities of the deconvolution methods to various types of error in phase identification. Graphic abstract
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Besharatloo et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: