Community-based intervention study demonstrates improved mood and mental wellbeing in women survivors of violence, highlighting the therapeutic value of trauma-informed movement.
Physical activity offers numerous health and wellbeing benefits, yet people experiencing gender-based violence, housing precarity, systemic oppression, and other forms of trauma are at heightened risk of physical inactivity. Trauma- and violence-informed physical activity (TVIPA) programming is a promising approach to support physical activity amongst these populations. This study examined the effects of a multi-site, community-based TVIPA intervention for women who have experienced interpersonal or structural violence. Using a feminist participatory action research approach, interventions were co-developed with community partners and implemented across four sites in Canada, prioritizing communities with limited access to structured physical activity programs. Each site offered a series of 7 six-week physical activity programs (e.g., dance, swimming, yoga) designed to foster safety, empowerment, and connection. Immediate effects were assessed using pre- and post-session mood ratings, and longer-term effects were captured through pre- and post-program measures of subjective mental and physical wellbeing across the six-week series. Of the 168 enrolled participants, 143 contributed repeated self-reported mood ratings before and after physical activity sessions. Participants reported moderately positive mood before sessions and further elevated positive mood afterward (M change = 0.94/5, SD = 0.94, d = 1.00), with the greatest improvements occurring on days when they began in a less positive mood. Across the six-week program, greater attendance was associated with improvements in mental health (b = 0.06, p < .001), but with lower physical health scores (b = -0.06, p < .001). Findings underscore the potential of community-driven, trauma- and violence-informed physical activity to enhance wellbeing among women affected by violence and structural inequities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darroch et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: