Design-based study reveals improved understanding of food transport and waste in preschool children, highlighting cooperative board games as effective sustainability education tools.
This study reports on a design-based, game-based learning (GBL) intervention aimed at fostering early understandings of responsible consumption in early childhood education. Building on a previous pilot phase in which teachers provided feedback on the Buy Smart cooperative board game, a revised version of the game was embedded within a two-session learning situation sequence designed to address food origin, transport distance, and waste generation. The intervention was implemented in a classroom of 25 five-years-old children. Data were collected through pre- and post-intervention elicitation tasks, classroom observations, children’s affective ratings, and teacher feedback, and analysed using an exploratory mixed-methods approach. The findings indicate that children’s criteria for judging which foods had the greatest environmental impact shifted from a narrow focus on visible leftovers toward a broader consideration of distance, transport, and pollution. Children generally evaluated the Buy Smart game positively and engaged with it as a meaningful context for revisiting key ideas, while the teacher valued the sequence as pedagogically useful and feasible, particularly when implemented in small groups with close adult mediation. From a methodological perspective, the study underscores the importance of multimodal, context-sensitive assessment in early childhood education, as the richest evidence of learning emerged from observation and oral discourse rather than from paper-and-pencil tasks. More broadly, the research contributes to the still limited field of sustainability-oriented GBL in early childhood by offering a concrete, developmentally appropriate example of how responsible consumption of local versus distant food products can be addressed through embodied activities, cooperative play, and locally grounded classroom experiences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romero-Gutierrez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: