Integrative conceptual review identifies five trauma-informed recovery priorities for earthquake-affected cities, highlighting the role of spatial identity and shelter in psychological healing.
Purpose This paper aims to develop a trauma-informed built-environment framework for post-earthquake recovery in seismic cities, connecting safety, shelter, urban identity, sensory continuity, participation and belonging. Design/methodology/approach An integrative conceptual review synthesises scholarship on post-disaster shelter, housing reconstruction, urban resilience, place identity, environmental psychology, trauma-informed design and neuroarchitecture. Targeted searching, concept-led source selection and thematic synthesis identify design-relevant principles for phase-based, culturally legible and ethically grounded recovery. Findings The synthesis identifies five linked recovery priorities: preparedness, acute stabilisation, transitional recovery, identity repair and long-term resilience and evaluation. Shelter and reconstruction can support recovery by integrating physical protection with privacy, social networks, cultural legibility, spatial continuity, governance capacity, equity and everyday routines. Research limitations/implications The paper presents no primary empirical data, clinical assessment or post-occupancy evaluation. Future research should test the framework through participatory, mixed-method and ethically sensitive studies in earthquake-affected cities. Practical implications The framework guides architects, planners, humanitarian actors and policymakers in connecting emergency shelter with phased recovery, identity repair, equity and implementation indicators. Social implications Identity-sensitive reconstruction can support dignity, perceived safety, social reconnection, collective memory and the processing of loss where displacement has weakened familiar urban relationships. Originality/value The paper integrates post-disaster shelter, urban identity, environmental psychology, trauma-informed design and neuroarchitecture within an operational recovery framework for seismic cities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maria A. El Helou (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: