Retrospective cohort study reveals bystander CPR primarily improves neurological recovery via prehospital circulation return in cardiac arrest, indicating most benefits depend on restoring blood flow.
Background/Objectives: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but whether its neurological benefit operates solely through prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is unresolved. We quantified the mediated and unmediated components. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of the Korean nationwide OHCA registry (2009–2024) in adults with cardiac or respiratory arrest, excluding arrests witnessed by on-duty personnel. The primary outcome was favorable neurological survival (Cerebral Performance Category 1–2 at discharge) defined across the whole cohort; prehospital ROSC was the mediator. Effects were decomposed with logistic models, including an exposure-by-mediator interaction. Results: Among 80,784 patients, 59,982 (74.2%) received bystander CPR. The natural direct effect was +1.24 percentage points (95% CI 0.97 to 1.51). With prehospital ROSC fixed by intervention at not achieved—for everyone, not only for patients observed to lack it—the controlled direct effect was +0.65 (0.41 to 0.85) and +0.70 (0.46 to 0.94; E-value 2.43, lower confidence limit 1.92) on restriction to 2016–2024. The total effect was +5.24 points (4.85 to 5.60), 76.4% of it ROSC-mediated. No survival effect was demonstrable at that value (+0.25, −0.14 to 0.61), and adjustment for initial rhythm left the neurological estimate indistinguishable from zero (+0.36, −0.02 to 0.69). Conclusions: A small component of the neurological benefit may lie outside the prehospital ROSC pathway—not outside restored circulation altogether since such survivors regained circulation in hospital—though most was ROSC-mediated. It is not established: an unmeasured confounder of moderate strength, or initial rhythm acting as a confounder rather than a mediator, would account for it. The estimates apply to events with ascertained bystander-CPR status, undocumented in 70% of otherwise eligible events. Prehospital ROSC may nonetheless understate the value of bystander response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: