Large quantities of poultry litter are applied each year to pastures in Arkansas and Oklahoma. Our objective was to monitor mineral concentrations in forages grown on poultry litter-amended soils and compare them with mineral requirements for gestating and early lactating beef cows. A total of 65 forage samples were gathered from four farms in northwest Arkansas and northeast Oklahoma from April 2000 to March 2002. Mean forage mineral concentrations were compared with beef cattle requirements using a two-tailed t test. Two-year average forage Ca, P, K, S, and Fe concentrations from each farm exceeded (P<0.05) gestation and lactation requirements, but forage Zn concentrations from one farm did not differ (P>0.05) from gestation and lactation requirements. On individual sampling dates, concentrations of Ca, P, K, and Zn rarely fell below lactation requirements. Mean forage Mg concentrations from one farm exceeded (P<0.05) lactation requirements, but those from the other three farms exceeded (P<0.05) gestation but not (P>0.05) lactation requirements. Mean tetany ratios from all farms were below (P<0.05) the tetany threshold of 2.2, but forage from two farms surpassed the tetany threshold during Spring 2000, and one sur-passed it during Spring 2001. Average forage Cu concentrations were below (P<0.05) requirements on one farm and did not differ (P>0.05) from the requirements on three farms. Forages from pastures fertilized with broiler litter may meet most but not all mineral requirements of beef cattle, and supplementation of specific minerals, particularly Mg and Cu, may be necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGinley et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: