Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation study demonstrates improved load parameter identification under time-varying nominal power using multi-window ARMA modeling, indicating enhanced power-system stability assessment.
As inverter-based renewable generation increases, load modeling from ambient measurements is important for power-system stability assessment. Under ambient conditions, voltage and frequency variations are small, whereas time-varying nominal power can substantially affect load-power variation. If nominal-power variation is not considered, it may be misattributed to voltage- and frequency-dependent load responses, resulting in biased parameter estimates. Because this misattribution depends on the variations within each time window, single-window estimation may suffer reduced accuracy. This study proposes a method that models time-varying nominal power using an autoregressive moving-average model to separate nominal-power variation from voltage- and frequency-dependent load responses and aggregates validation errors across multiple time windows to reduce dependence on any specific window. Numerical simulations under two nominal-power variation levels were compared with single-window estimation and a previously proposed sensitivity-based window-selection method. When the maximum 100 s peak-to-peak nominal-power variation was 1.0% of the mean nominal power, the proposed method achieved an overall error of 0.100, 86% lower than the mean single-window error and 79% lower than the best sensitivity-based result. Additional analyses under modified identification and data-generation conditions showed that the proposed method generally maintained comparatively low identification errors, although accuracy varied with the conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamata et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: