Retrospective study demonstrates high nodule shrinkage and preserved hormone function following radiofrequency ablation in post-lobectomy patients, indicating an effective alternative to surgery.
Background A new symptomatic nodule may develop or a preexisting nodule may grow to warrant treatment in the remaining lobe of patients who previously had a unilateral thyroid lobectomy. Conventional management often results in completion thyroidectomy, but radiofrequency ablation (RFA) offers a minimally invasive alternative to surgical resection. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of RFA in treating these cases. Methods This retrospective study included 47 patients with a history of thyroid lobectomy who underwent RFA for thyroid nodules in the contralateral lobe. Eight patients had a history of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), 25 had hyperfunctioning nodules, and 14 had symptomatic thyroid nodules. Primary outcomes were the volume reduction ratio (VRR) at 3 months, 6 months, and final follow‐up. Secondary outcomes were post‐RFA complications and maintenance of thyroid function. Results Median VRR at final follow‐up was 81.0% [IQR: 58%–89%]. Complete disappearance was achieved in 6.4% of patients, while progression was observed in 2.1% of cases during follow‐up. Post‐RFA complications were minimal, with three patients experiencing temporary vocal cord paresis and two patients reporting post‐procedure discomfort/pain. No other complications were observed. No patient experienced a change in baseline thyroid function, and no new cases of hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism occurred. Conclusion RFA is a safe and effective alternative to completion thyroidectomy for remaining thyroid nodules in post‐lobectomy patients. RFA allows clinically meaningful volume reduction while maintaining a low complication rate in the hands of an experienced operator. Level of Evidence 4.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bashumeel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: