Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Atmospheric modeling study reveals distinct ozone sensitivity regimes across desert urban basins, highlighting the need for localized emission controls in air-quality management.
Ground-level ozone (O3) remains a persistent air-quality challenge in the Southwest U.S. desert, including Arizona, despite nationwide emission reductions. Here, we apply the variable-resolution global chemistry–climate model MUSICAv0 to investigate O3 formation, transport, and chemical regime variability across Phoenix, Tucson, Yuma, and surrounding rural regions during July 2020 monsoon-onset conditions. Model performance is evaluated against surface observations, satellite retrievals, and regional WRF-Chem simulations. MUSICAv0 captures the observed diurnal variability of O3 and its precursors across all regions, with generally good agreement in Tucson, Yuma, and rural sites. However, a persistent afternoon overestimation is evident in Phoenix. The updated MOZART-TS2 chemistry reduces the Phoenix MDA8 bias, while budget analysis shows that the remaining bias cannot be explained by chemistry alone and reflects combined transport, deposition, and boundary-layer influences. Chemical regime diagnostics indicate that Phoenix exhibits more VOC-sensitive chemistry with shifts toward transition conditions during high-O3 events, Tucson operates largely within a transition regime, and Yuma and rural regions remain predominantly NOx-limited. These findings demonstrate that for the July 2020 monsoon-onset conditions, variable-resolution global models provide a unified framework for diagnosing chemical regime sensitivity, model biases, and their interaction with transport processes in arid urban environments, supporting future O3 mitigation strategies that integrate updated emissions, high-resolution satellite observations, and field campaign constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mirrezaei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: