Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aim We used data from the annual Fourth of July Butterfly Count for the years 1989–97 to examine patterns of species richness and total butterfly abundance across North America and within topographically diverse and disturbed landscapes. Location We analysed counts from 514 different locations in North America. The counts represent all areas of the USA and southern Canada, with a few Mexican sites as well, although most counts were in the eastern USA. Methods First, we standardized published count data according to the effort expended per count (total party‐hours). Using regression analysis and analysis of variance, we then examined the impact of latitude, longitude, topographical relief, habitat disturbance and different climatic measures on the species richness and total abundance of butterflies per count. We also examined the abundance of exotic species in disturbed landscapes. Results Our analyses suggest that: (1) species richness is highest at low latitudes and near Rocky Mountain longitudes; (2) the total abundance of individuals is highest in northern US latitudes and Great Plains longitudes; (3) species richness but not total abundance increases with greater topographical relief; (4) species richness and diversity indices are lower in more disturbed habitats; and (5) the abundance of the introduced Pieris rapae (L.) is greater in more disturbed habitats. Main conclusions Different factors control the abundance and species richness of North American butterflies. Along with geographical location, habitat disturbance and topographical variability affect species richness. Our analysis also shows the value of broad‐based monitoring regimes, such as the North American Fourth of July Butterfly Count.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kocher et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: