Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of cetuximab in the palliative treatment of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) unresponsive to first-line gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GEMOX) pretreatment. METHODS: Nine patients (mean age: 54 years) with recurrent or unresectable CCA (6 peripheral and 3 hilar CCA, histologically proven) resistant to GEMOX received cetuximab 400 mg/m2 on day 1 then 250 mg/m2 weekly combined with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on day 1 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 2, every 3 weeks. Immunohistochemical detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and erbB-2, as well as EGFR gene copy number were assessed. Tumor response was measured using RECIST. RESULTS: A total of 43 cycles were given (3-8 per patient). After 6 months, CT scans revealed 1 complete response, 1 partial response, 1 stable disease and 6 patients with disease progression. Median time to tumor progression and overall survival were 4 and 7 months, respectively. All patients relapsed (mean follow-up: 17 months). In 6 patients, death was not related to treatment. Toxicity included grade 3 neutropenia (n = 1) and acne-like rash (n = 7). In 7 of the 9 patients, EGFR was highly expressed in all tumor cells without gene amplification. No expression of erbB-2 was noted. CONCLUSION: Even in the absence of EGFR gene amplification, cetuximab + GEMOX is a well-tolerated palliative treatment in patients with advanced CCA. Adding cetuximab circumvents tumor resistance to GEMOX.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paule et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: