Key result
Ambient lighting and sonification feedback improves concentric range of motion consistency ~13% vs no feedback.
Why the study?
Physical exercise improves blood pressure, and extending resistance exercises traditionally performed at gyms to the home setting may increase participation.
Does ambient lighting and sonification feedback improve exercise form and psychophysiological experience during home-based resistance training in normotensive and prehypertensive individuals?
Does ambient lighting and sonification feedback improve exercise form and psychophysiological experience during home-based resistance training in normotensive and prehypertensive individuals?
Ambient lighting and sonification feedback improves resistance exercise execution and perception compared to no feedback, but does not outperform a human tele-coach.
Feasibility of home-based A/S-guided resistance exercise shown in small cohort; leaves open efficacy for blood pressure reduction in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND Physical exercise is an effective lifestyle intervention to improve blood pressure. Although aerobic sports can be performed anywhere, resistance exercises are traditionally performed at the gym; extending the latter to the home setting may promote an increase in the number of practitioners. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate a sensor-based system that guides resistance exercises through ambient lighting and sonification (A/S) feedback in a home setting in 34 study participants who were normotensive and prehypertensive. METHODS Participants took part in a 1.5-hour exercise session in which they experienced the A/S feedback (ie, experimental condition) as well as a control condition (ie, no feedback) and a reference condition (ie, verbal feedback through a human remote coach). The system was evaluated for improving exercise form (range of motion, timing, and breathing patterns) as well as psychophysiological experience (perceived exertion, attentional focus, competence, and motivation). RESULTS A/S feedback was significantly better than the control for concentric (mean 2.48, SD 0.75 seconds; P<.001) and eccentric (mean 2.92, SD 1.05 seconds; P<.001) contraction times, concentric range of motion consistency (mean 15.64, SD 8.31 cm vs mean 17.94, SD 9.75 cm; P<.001), and perceived exertion (mean 3.37, SD 0.78 vs mean 3.64, SD 0.76; P<.001). However, A/S feedback did not outperform verbal feedback on any of these measures. The breathing technique was best in the control condition (ie, without any feedback). Participants did not show more positive changes in perceived competence with A/S feedback or verbal feedback. CONCLUSIONS The system seemed to improve resistance exercise execution and perception in comparison with the control, but did not outperform a human tele-coach. Further research is warranted to improve the breathing technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radha et al. (2019) studied Normotensive and prehypertensive (n=34). Ambient lighting and sonification (A/S) feedback vs. No feedback (control) and verbal feedback (reference) was evaluated on Concentric range of motion consistency (p=<.001). Ambient lighting and sonification feedback significantly improved concentric range of motion consistency (15.64 cm vs 17.94 cm; P<.001) and perceived exertion compared to no feedback.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: