Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The use of whole-body K, N and H2O as quantitative indices of the fat-free body is based on the assumption that each of these constituents is maintained in a relatively constant concentration in the fat-free body. Two further assumptions—that each of these constituents is found predominantly within the lean muscle mass in a relatively constant amount and that amounts found outside this tissue vary in proportion to amounts found within the lean—lead to the conclusion that body K, N and H2O are also indices of lean muscle mass. Much chemical data has been reported emphasizing muscle-to-muscle and tissue-to-tissue differences in potassium content as important sources of error in predicting body composition from 40K. However, it is not necessary for K, N or H2O contents to be the same in each tissue of the fat-free body, or each muscle of the lean muscle mass, for the whole-body constituents to be valuable measures of the fat-free body or of lean muscle mass.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lohman et al. (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: