Key result
Continuous cilostazol for one year post-CAS is linked to 0% in-stent restenosis.
Why the study?
Does continuous daily use of cilostazol for at least 1 year prevent in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing elective carotid artery stenting?
Cohort (n=199)
Does continuous daily use of cilostazol for at least 1 year prevent in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing elective carotid artery stenting?
Continuous daily use of cilostazol for at least 1 year after carotid artery stenting significantly reduces the risk of angiographic in-stent restenosis compared to short-term or no use.
Extended cilostazol use was associated with less restenosis post-stenting; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported that cilostazol (CLS) may reduce in-stent restenosis (ISR) after carotid artery stenting (CAS). However, it is not known for how long CLS must be continued to prevent ISR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of patients who underwent elective CAS and follow-up angiography at 3 months and 1 year after the procedure. ISR was defined as stenosis of 50% or greater on digital subtraction angiography. The cumulative incidence rates of angiographic ISR were compared between the three groups, divided according to duration of CLS use : (1) patients who were maintained on CLS for 12 months or more after CAS (12M CLS group, n=70), (2) patients who were treated with CLS for the first 3 months after CAS (3M CLS group, n=23), and (3) patients who did not receive CLS (no CLS group, n=136). RESULTS: A total of 229 lesions in 199 patients were included in our analysis. During a median follow-up of 365 days, ISR was detected in 15 lesions. The cumulative ISR rates overall and in the 12M CLS, 3M CLS, and no CLS groups were 5.6%, 0%, 5.0%, and 8.4%, respectively, at 1 year, and the log rank test showed that there was a significant difference between the three groups (p<0.05). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the 12M CLS group had a significantly lower risk of ISR than the 3M CLS group (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 3.06e-10, 95% CI 0 to 0.51, p<0.05) and the no CLS group (aRR 1.41e-10, 95% CI 0 to 0.15, p<0.001), whereas no difference was found between the 3M CLS group and the no CLS group. CONCLUSIONS: An overall cumulative ISR rate of 5.6% was documented angiographically at 1 year after CAS. Continuous daily use of CLS (for at least 1 year) may have a beneficial effect on long term prevention of ISR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyazaki et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Carotid artery stenting (n=199). Cilostazol for ≥12 months vs. No cilostazol or cilostazol for 3 months was evaluated on In-stent restenosis (stenosis ≥50% on angiography) at 1 year (aRR 1.41e-10, 95% CI 0 to 0.15, p=<0.001). Continuous daily use of cilostazol for ≥12 months after carotid artery stenting significantly reduced in-stent restenosis compared to no cilostazol (0% vs 8.4%; aRR 1.41e-10; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: