Comparison of Open, Percutaneous, and Translaryngeal Tracheostomies

INTRODUCTION With 3 tracheostomy techniques currently available, controversy exists regarding which is safest and most economical. Percutaneous (PDT) and the new translaryngeal (TLT) tracheostomies are cited as more cost‐effective than the traditional open surgical procedure because they are bedside techniques. Our objective was to compare the perioperative and postoperative complications of the 3 techniques. STUDY DESIGN This was a prospective trial involving 100 consecutive patients who underwent tracheostomy between April and December of 1997 at the London Health Sciences Centre and St Joseph's Health Centre in London, Canada. RESULTS Fifty open tracheostomies were performed. Indications included prolonged ventilation (n = 42), airway protection (n = 5), pulmonary hygiene (n = 2), and sleep apnea (n = 1). A tension pneumothorax was the one significant intraoperative complication. Fifteen postoperative complications occurred, most notable of which was a 2‐L hemorrhage at 24 hours. Thirty‐seven TLTs were performed, 20 in patients with coagulopathy. Indications were prolonged intubation (n = 27), airway protection (n = 9), and pulmonary hygiene (n = 1). One intraoperative complication of accidental decannulation occurred. One postoperative complication, a pretracheal abscess, occurred in a decannulated transplant patient 2 weeks after the procedure. Thirteen PDTs were performed. Indications were prolonged intubation (n = 6), airway protection (n = 6), and tracheal toilet (n = 1). No significant complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS TLT and PDT have fewer complications than the traditional open technique. TLT appears to have the greatest utility in the coagulopathic patient.