Key result
Sedentary time is linked to higher BMI and body fat, while light activity is inversely associated.
Why the study?
While sedentary time is an independent risk for cardiometabolic disease, the benefits of easily attainable light-intensity physical activity on cardiometabolic disease risk factors are seldom explored.
Are accelerometer-measured sedentary time and light-intensity physical activity associated with cardiometabolic disease risk factors in Indian office workers?
Cross-Sectional (n=130)
Are accelerometer-measured sedentary time and light-intensity physical activity associated with cardiometabolic disease risk factors in Indian office workers?
In insufficiently active office workers, light-intensity physical activity is associated with improved cardiometabolic risk factors compared to sedentary time, highlighting a potentially accessible intervention for cardiovascular prevention.
Should not yet change practice in office workers; hypothesis-generating for light-activity interventions targeting cardiometabolic risk.
Sedentary time (ST) is found to be an independent risk for cardiometabolic disease (CMD). While moderate to vigorous physical activity has demonstrated clear benefits in reducing the risk of CMD, only a fraction of the world's population meets the recommended levels. The benefits of easily attainable light-intensity physical activity (LIPA) on CMD risk factors are seldom explored. Our study aimed to explore the association of accelerometer-measured ST and LIPA with CMD risk among Indian office workers. ST and LIPA were recorded using a hip-worn accelerometer (Actigraph) for seven consecutive days, while CMD risk factors were evaluated in 130 insufficiently active office workers. The association of accelerometer-measured ST and LIPA with CMD risk factors were examined using multivariate regression. Higher ST were positively associated with high body mass index (β = 0.330, p < 0.001) and body fat percentage (β = 0.422, p < 0.001), while LIPA exhibited an inverse relationship with the above variables. Additionally, higher LIPA was associated to high fasting blood sugar levels (β = −0.308, p = 0.023). Similarly, high ST was associated with low heart rate variability (HRV) (β = −0.407, p = 0.024) while high LIPA was associated with high HRV (β = 0.379, p = 0.003). However, the associations remain insignificant for majority of other CMD risk factors. Elevated ST is consistently linked to higher body mass, FBS and lower HRV (an indicator of autonomic stability). LIPA is associated with lower risk of above variables. Still, the association of ST and LIPA with other CMD risk factors remain uncertain. Longitudinal studies with larger samples of Indian office workers is needed to validate the present study findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chandrasekaran et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiometabolic disease risk (n=130). Sedentary time and light-intensity physical activity was evaluated on Body mass index (β = 0.330, p=<0.001). Higher sedentary time was positively associated with body mass index (β=0.330, p<0.001) and body fat percentage, while light-intensity physical activity exhibited an inverse relationship.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: