Key result
Hepatitis delta virus infection was present in 84% of 13 cases with Labrea hepatitis and 62% of 8 cases with extensive necrosis, though its causal role remains questioned.
This letter questions the causal link between Hepatitis Delta Virus infection and Labrea hepatitis proposed in a previous study.
To the Editor. —In an interesting article, Bensabath et al1suggest that delta virus infection is the preponderant cause of Labrea hepatitis. They declare that the clinical picture of the classic form of massive hepatic necrosis is indistinguishable from the fulminant steatosis observed in Labrea hepatitis. Among the 21 cases histologically examined they found 13 cases with morula cells (Labrea hepatitis), 84% of whom had delta infection. In the eight cases of extensive necrosis there was a 62% incidence of delta infection. The authors conclude that both forms of acute hepatic failure can be attributed to delta infection. There is no doubt that delta infection is prevalent in the region, but this argument is not sufficient to prove that it is the cause of Labrea hepatitis, particularly because delta hepatitis is a worldwide infection known to produce, on occasion, a classic fulminant hepatitis with massive necrosis. Why, then, do
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edna Strauss (1988) conducted a letter in Labrea hepatitis and acute hepatic failure (n=21). Hepatitis Delta Virus Infection was evaluated on Incidence of delta infection. Hepatitis delta virus infection was present in 84% of 13 cases with Labrea hepatitis and 62% of 8 cases with extensive necrosis, though its causal role remains questioned.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: