Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Effects of pork collagen in emulsified and whole muscle products were evaluated. Eight frankfurter treatments (0%, 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%, 3%, and 3.5% pork collagen) and 4 ham treatments (0%, 1%, 2%, and 3% pork collagen) were formulated. Frankfurters and hams were evaluated for cooked yields, purge, color, texture, and sensory characteristics. Incorporation of pork collagen at 1% and above significantly ( P < 0.05) increased cooked and chilled yields in frankfurters but did not have any effect in hams. Purge was significantly ( P < 0.05) reduced in both frankfurters and hams after 4 wk of storage. Sensory difference testing showed no significant difference up to 2% usage level of pork collagen in both frankfurters and hams ( P > 0.05).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prabhu et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: