Key result
Non-specialty implants rank as the most expensive single-use items in craniotomies, costing up to ~$3643.
Why the study?
Craniotomies comprise a significant portion of hospital costs with price variability for single-use instruments, and understanding these cost variations can inform operating physicians.
Observational
No
Single-use items in craniotomies have highly variable costs, with non-specialty implants being the highest cost generators, highlighting the need for economic stewardship by surgeons.
Non-specialty implants drive highest craniotomy costs; extends cost-mapping data but leaves open effects of stewardship on expenditures.
Introduction All-cause craniotomies comprise a significant portion of neurosurgical practice as well as hospital costs. While some instruments are reusable with a fixed cost, price variability for similar single-use instruments exists. A better understanding of these cost variations within cranial procedures can better inform operating physicians to be cost-sensitive stewards. Objective In this study, we examine how single-use items contribute to the overall cost of cranial procedures. Methods A de-identified institutional database containing records of all single-use items from craniotomies between July 1, 2019, and June 30, 2020, was subject to a longitudinal analysis by three independent parties (one senior surgeon, one resident, and one medical student). Four hundred and sixty-nine unique single-use items were identified and classified by function. Similar items were combined, and a range of costs was provided. Three sample cases with sum costs were reviewed for cost division and primary contributors. Results The category with the highest median cost across all cases was non-specialty implants comprising dural onlays, mesh, aneurysm clips, and plates. The category with the lowest median cost was personal protective equipment. The items with the most cost variability were sterile surgical patties due to the variety of sizes and preset multipacks. The proportion of cost generators varies from craniotomy indication. Conclusion While institution dependent, awareness of cost generators in cranial cases is important for economic stewardship. For single-use items, costs are highly variable and not insignificant. Surgeons and neurosurgical departments are responsible for allocating single-use items in a responsible and efficient manner.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalluri et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Craniotomies. Single-use surgical instruments was evaluated on Cost of single-use items. Non-specialty implants were the most expensive single-use items across craniotomy cases, ranging from $53 to $3643, while personal protective equipment was the least expensive.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: