Key result
FIB-4 scores average ~1.9 in severe preeclampsia versus mild cases and healthy controls.
Why the study?
It was unknown how the FIB-4 score is altered in preeclampsia and whether it differs by preeclampsia severity or the presence of fetal and maternal adverse outcomes.
Does the FIB-4 score correlate with the severity of preeclampsia and the presence of adverse outcomes in pregnant women?
Observational (n=411)
Does the FIB-4 score correlate with the severity of preeclampsia and the presence of adverse outcomes in pregnant women?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.93% vs 0.58%
p-value: p=0.003
The FIB-4 score is significantly elevated in severe preeclampsia and a cutoff of ≥0.758 may help identify patients at risk for neurological symptoms.
May signal hepatic involvement in severe preeclampsia; leaves open its value for risk stratification or management.
Objectives This study aims to investigate how the fibrosis index based on four factors (FIB-4) is altered in preeclampsia and whether the FIB-4 score differs with respect to the severity of preeclampsia and the presence of fetal and maternal adverse outcomes. Methods One hundred and forty-two patients with mild preeclampsia (34.6 %), one hundred and ninety patients who have preeclampsia with severe features (46.2 %), and 79 healthy pregnant controls (19.2 %) were included in the study. Fetal adverse outcomes occurred in 40.1 %, and maternal adverse outcomes only appeared as neurological symptoms in 20.5 % of the preeclampsia patients. Results Healthy controls had significantly lower FIB-4 scores than women with mild preeclampsia, and women with mild preeclampsia had significantly lower FIB-4 scores than women who had preeclampsia with severe features (respectively 0.58±0.29 vs. 0.68±0.44 vs. 1.93±4.92, p=0.003). The FIB-4 scores of preeclampsia patients with neurologic symptoms and preeclampsia patients with fetal adverse events were found to be similar to preeclampsia patients who did not have these problems. In ROC curve analysis, FIB-4 scores ≥0.758 indicated the presence of neurologic symptoms in preeclampsia patients, with a sensitivity of 0.66 and a specificity of 0.66 (p=0.004). Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to establish the FIB-4 scores of preeclampsia patients and determine if FIB-4 scores change with respect to maternal and fetal adverse outcomes. Our findings suggest that FIB-4 might be used to predict pregnancies destined to be complicated with preeclampsia and preeclampsia patients who are more likely to experience maternal and fetal adverse outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özer et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Preeclampsia (n=411). Preeclampsia severity vs. Healthy pregnant controls was evaluated on FIB-4 score (p=0.003). FIB-4 scores were significantly higher in women with severe preeclampsia (1.93) compared to mild preeclampsia (0.68) and healthy controls (0.58) (p=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: