Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We evaluated the effect and mechanism of yam polysaccharide on the proliferation of the prostatic cancer cell line and tumor-bearing mice. The effect of nanoyam polysaccharide on prostatic cancer cell line PC-3 was measured using the scratch adhesion test and flow cytometry. The growth effect induced by nanoyam polysaccharide was detected with the CCK-8 test. The levels of caspase-3 protein were determined with Western blot. In our data, nanoyam polysaccharide presented inhibitory effect on the proliferation of PC-3. The scratch adhesion test showed that the rate of wound healing in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group ( p < 0.05 ). Flow cytometry assay showed that, after treatment with nanoyam polysaccharide, the apoptosis rate in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group ( 45.8 % ± 2.6 % , 25.8 % ± 3.1 % ; p < 0.05 ). Western blot assay showed upregulated levels of caspase-3 in the intervention group, compared to the control group ( p < 0.05 ). Our results suggested that nanoyam polysaccharide strongly suppressed the growth of prostatic cancer by inducing the overexpression of caspase-3 and may be a potent anticancer strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: