Purpose: Biallelic repeat expansions in the Replication Factor C Subunit 1 (RFC1) gene are associated with cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, and vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS).Recent studies have shown that chronic cough often precedes neurological symptoms in CANVAS by 10-20 years, suggesting a potential link between RFC1 repeat expansion and chronic cough.However, the prevalence and clinical relevance of RFC1 expansions in chronic cough, particularly in non-Caucasian populations, remain unknown.Methods: We analyzed 128 consecutive patients with chronic cough who were enrolled in the Korean Chronic Cough Registry at 2 tertiary clinics.All patients underwent a comprehensive clinical evaluation and were followed up for at least 6 months to assess treatment response and to identify the diagnosis of refractory chronic cough (RCC).RFC1 repeat expansions, including both biallelic and monoallelic variants, were assessed using flanking and repeat-primed polymerase chain reactions.Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed in selected cases to explore additional genetic variants.Results: RFC1 repeat expansions were identified in 12 patients with chronic cough, comprising 3 biallelic (2.3%), and 9 monoallelic (7.0%) carriers.RCC was diagnosed in 55 of the 109 subjects who completed follow-up.The percentage of RFC1 expansions was significantly higher in RCC than in non-RCC (18.2% vs. 1.9%,P = 0.005), comprising 5.5% biallelic and 12.7% monoallelic expansions in the RCC group.Carriers had longer cough duration (11.0 vs. 4.0 years, P = 0.048) and poorer cough-specific quality of life (Leicester Cough Questionnaire score: 8.5 ± 2.2 vs. 10.5 ± 3.4; P = 0.027).All of the biallelic carriers were diagnosed with RCC and showed poor response to antitussive therapies.WGS identified no additional pathogenic variants in most cases.Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate RFC1 repeat expansions in non-Caucasian patients with chronic cough.The findings suggest that RFC1 expansions may define a distinct, treatment-refractory phenotype of chronic cough.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: