Key result
Typhi Vi vaccination is linked to lower antibody responses in primary immunodeficiency versus healthy controls.
Why the study?
Does Typhi Vi vaccination elicit an adequate antibody response in patients with primary immunodeficiency compared to healthy controls?
Observational
Does Typhi Vi vaccination elicit an adequate antibody response in patients with primary immunodeficiency compared to healthy controls?
p-value: p=0.006
Measurement of the response to Typhi Vi vaccination could serve as a complementary assay for assessing adaptive immunity to polysaccharide antigens in patients with primary immunodeficiency.
Typhi Vi response may offer alternative to Pneumovax for immunity assessment; leaves open validation in PID before clinical use.
Measurement of an individuals ability to respond to polysaccharide antigens is a crucial test to determine adaptive immunity. Currently the response to Pneumovax ® is utilized but with the success of Prevnar ® , measurement of the response to Pneumovax may be challenging. The aim of the study was to assess the response to Typhi Vi vaccination in both children and adult control groups and patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID). In the control groups, >95% of the individuals had pre Typhi Vi vaccination concentrations <100 U/mL and there was significant increase in concentration post Typhi Vi vaccination (p<0.0001) with>94% achieving ≥3 fold increase in concentration (FI). The response to Typhi Vi vaccination was significantly lower in both children ( p = 0.006) and adult ( p = 0.002) PID groups when compared to their control groups. 11% and 55% of the children and adult PID groups respectively did not obtain a response >3FI. There were no significant differences between the responses obtained in the children and adult PID groups. When all individuals with PID were separated into those with either hypogammaglobulinemia (HYPO) or common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), both groups had a significantly lower median FI than the control group (19, 95%CI 5–56 vs 59, 95%CI 7–237; p = 0.01 and 1, 95%CI 1–56 vs 32, 95%CI 5–136; p = 0.005). Further, a >3FI differentiated the antibody responses between both the CVID and HYPO groups and their control groups (AUC: 0.83, 95%CI: 0.65–1.00, p = 0.005 and 0.81, 95% CI: 0.65–0.97, p = 0.01). The data suggests that measurement of the response to Typhi Vi vaccination could represent a complementary assay for the assessment of the response to a polysaccharide vaccine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumarage et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Primary immunodeficiency. Typhi Vi vaccination vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on ≥3 fold increase in antibody concentration post-vaccination (p=0.006). Typhi Vi vaccination elicited a significantly lower antibody response in children and adults with primary immunodeficiency compared to healthy controls (p=0.006 and p=0.002, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: