Electrical Tomography Applied to the Detection of Subsurface Cavities

We have analyzed the geoelectric response produced by three cavities cut into different geological substrata of granite, phyllite, and sandstone that had previously been characterized by direct methods.We also examined a mining void excavated in granite.In each case, we applied three different geoelectric arrays (Wenner-Schlumberger, Wenner and dipole-dipole) and several inter-electrode spacings.The survey results suggest that electrical resistivity tomography is a viable geophysical tool for the detection and monitoring of mining voids and other subsurface cavities.The results vary depending on a wide range of factors, such as the depth and diameter of the cavity, the multi-electrode array used, the inter-electrode spacing, the geological model, and the density of the data.The resolution capacity of the Wenner-Schlumberger array for the detection of these cavities was greater than that of the Wenner array and slightly better than the dipole-dipole.There is a direct relationship between inter-electrode spacing and diameter of the cavity.In general, we observed a loss of resolution as the distance between the electrodes increased.The most efficient detection was achieved when the inter-electrodes distance was less than or equal to the diameter of the cavity itself.In addition, cavity detection became increasingly less precise with its depth beneath the surface.Cavities with a radius of about 1.5 m were located by both the Wenner-Schlumberger method and the dipole-dipole at depths of more than 4.6 m, which means that prospecting can be carried out at depths 3 times the radius of the cavity.