BACKGROUND: The prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains poor despite improvements in treatment and post-operative clinical management. We review our experiences and evaluate our current surgical approaches by comparing patients from two consecutive treatment periods. METHODS: One hundred forty-four patients who underwent hepatectomy for ICC between 1993 and 2014 were divided into groups that received treatment before (n = 65, first period) and after 2006 (n = 79, second period), when new treatment options such as adjuvant chemotherapy and multimodal therapy for recurrence were introduced. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: First-period patients exhibited more advanced tumor characteristics, including larger tumors, higher serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels, and vascular invasion. Median overall survival (OS) durations of the first- and second-period groups were 21.4 and 57.7 months, respectively (p < 0.001); corresponding median disease-free survival (DFS) durations were 12.2 and 16.6 months, respectively (p = 0.027). Multivariate analysis found an independent association of the treatment time period with OS and DFS. Notably, second-period patients with N1 disease achieved a longer OS and DFS (median OS time: 12.4 and 26.0 months, p = 0.0018, and median DFS: 4.7 and 10.7 months p = 0.019, respectively). Among recurrent patients (first, n = 50 and second, n = 44), second-period patients had a significantly longer survival after recurrence (8.0 vs. 22.3 months, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ICC patients, particularly those with N1 disease, achieved significant survival improvements that were partly attributable to patient selection, adjuvant chemotherapy, and multimodal treatment after recurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoh et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: