Key result
Ectopic miR-206 partially rescues myoblast differentiation defects in cell models of myotonic dystrophy.
Ectopic miR-206 partially rescues myogenesis deficiency in myotonic dystrophy cell models by promoting MyoD expression and inhibiting Celf1 accumulation.
Hypothesis-generating in cell models; leaves open whether miR-206 modulation offers therapeutic benefit in myotonic dystrophy.
Objectives: In this study, we aim to determine how CUG-expansion and the abundance of Celf1 regulates normal myocyte differentiation and reveal the role ofmiR-206 in myotonic dystrohy and explore a possible gene therapy vector. Methods: we set up CUG-expansion and Celf1 overexpression C2C12 cell models to imitate the myocyte differentiation defects of DM1, then transfected AdvmiR-206 into cell models, tested the level of myogenic markers MyoD, MyoG, Mef2c, Celf1 by RT-PCRand Western Blotting, detected myotube formation by myosin heavy chain immunostaining. Result: 3′-UTR CUG-expansion leads to myotube defects and impaired myoblasts differentiation. Overexpression of Celf1 inhibits myoblast differentiation and impairs differentiation. Knockdown of Celf1 partially rescues differentiation defects of myoblasts harboring CUG-expansion. miR-206 incompletely reverses myoblast differentiation inhibition induced by CUG-expansion and partially recuses myoblast differentiation defects induced by Celf1 overexpression. Conclusions: Ectopic miR-206 mimicking the endogenous temporal patterns specifically drives a myocyte program that boosts myoblast lineages, likely by promoting the expression of MyoD to rectify the myogenic deficiency by stimulating the accumulation of Celf1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2018) studied Myotonic dystrophy type 1. miR-206 was evaluated on Myoblast differentiation and myotube formation. Ectopic miR-206 partially rescues myoblast differentiation defects induced by CUG-expansion and Celf1 overexpression in cell models of myotonic dystrophy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: