Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Construction of the defect structure is a significant approach to optimize the electronic structure and promote the reaction kinetics. However, excessive defects will destroy the structure stability and further inhibit the performance of the electrode material. Herein, a series of copper Prussian blue (CuFe-PBA) nanomaterials with different contents of [Fe(CN) 6 ] defects are synthesized by a simple chemical coprecipitation method using sodium citrate as a chelating agent and adjusting its ratio with copper ion. The effect of defect regulation on the crystal structure and the difference in the electrochemical properties of CuFe-PBA nanoparticles with different defect contents are studied. The experimental results indicate that reducing the defect content can significantly enhance the energy storage performances of PBAs. CuFe-PBA-2 has the maximum lattice parameters in all samples, ensuring rapid ion migration and electrochemical reaction kinetics, achieving a high specific capacitance of 220 F g –1 at 1 A g –1 and a superior rate capability with 86.4% of the initial specific capacity at 10 A g –1 . Furthermore, the minimum [Fe(CN) 6 ] vacancies increase the load-bearing capacity while guaranteeing the framework’s flexibility, thereby enhancing structural stability and ensuring that CuFe-PBA-2 can provide an ultralong cycle life of 107.4% in 10,000 cycles. The hybrid device (CuFe-PBA-2//CNT) receives an energy density of 7.1 Wh kg –1 at a power density of 1.0 kW kg –1 and an energy density of 5.6 Wh kg –1 at a high power density of 7.0 kW kg –1 . This work offers a method for regulating defects in CuFe-PBA nanoparticles and provides insight into the relationship between defects and electrochemical performances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: