The trapped field BTP(z) and the total trapped flux ΦT(z) as a function of the distance z from the bulk surface have been measured on a GdBaCuO superconducting bulk of 45 mm in diameter, which was magnetized by a sequential pulsed field application (SPA) method, a modified multi-pulse technique with stepwise cooling (MMPSC), and a subsequent iterative magnetizing operation with gradually reduced pulse field amplitude (IMRA). A trapped field of BTP = 3.10 T was realized by the MMPSC method, which was higher than that attained by SPA (BTP = 2.35 T). ΦT (0.5 mm), which was 1.64 mWb after the MMPSC method, was enhanced by about 53%, to 2.51 mWb, by the subsequent IMRA method due to the additional flux trapping. The MMPSC method combined with the IMRA process (MMPSC+IMRA) is an effective and promising pulse field magnetizing technique to enhance both BTP and ΦT on any superconducting bulks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujishiro et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: