Key result
FDG PET/CT SUVmax strongly correlates with sarcoma grade but remains secondary to histopathology.
Why the study?
Can FDG PET/CT be used as a marker for grading sarcomas?
Can FDG PET/CT be used as a marker for grading sarcomas?
FDG PET/CT is a useful adjunct for grading sarcomas, particularly when histopathology is unavailable, due to the strong association between tumor grade and SUVmax.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid sarcoma grading when histopathology unavailable; leaves open prospective validation before broader use.
The clinical course of sarcomas is difficult to predict on the basis of current clinical and pathologic prognostic criteria and further advancements for diagnosis, tumor–nodes–metastasis staging, grading and prognosis are actively being sought. This article discusses fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT as a marker for grading sarcomas and briefly touches on other roles of FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of this disease. Incidence, risk factors, demographics, staging and grading systems are reviewed. Limitations of the major grading systems are discussed, with a focus on interobserver variability. Next, a summary of evidence to suggest that FDG PET/CT can be used for grading sarcomas is presented. Sarcoma grade is strongly associated with SUVmax; however, FDG PET/CT cannot entirely supplant histologic grading and the former should be used alone only when histopathology is not available. Certain limitations are touched upon in the metabolic grading of these tumors and finally, the future perspective ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rakheja et al. (2013) conducted a review in Sarcomas. FDG PET/CT was evaluated. FDG PET/CT SUVmax is strongly associated with sarcoma grade, but should only be used alone when histopathology is unavailable.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: